Cooper Lighting brand logo

IES / LDT resource center

Cooper Lighting photometric resources, read with context

Use file type, distribution, test basis and luminaire configuration together. A photometric file is a model input—not a substitute for project calculations or field verification.

Resource data fields

FieldWhat to verifyWhy it matters
File formatIES for common North American workflows; LDT for EULUMDAT workflowsImport support and metadata conventions vary by calculation software.
Luminous fluxExample review point: 12,000 lm for the exact tested configurationOutput changes with drive current, optics, CCT and thermal condition.
DistributionCandela table, beam angle and symmetryTotal lumens cannot describe spacing, cutoff or vertical illumination.
ColorCCT, Ra and available TM-30 informationColor quality and visual preference cannot be inferred from wattage.
Lifetime basisLM-80 source data and TM-21 projection contextL70 projections are not the same as a complete luminaire warranty.
EnvironmentIP/IK rating, ambient limits and mounting orientationOptical data does not establish environmental suitability.

Example values are selection references, not universal Cooper Lighting product claims. Match every value to the current file header, cut sheet and configured catalog item.

File review checklist

Configuration identity

Confirm catalog designation, optic, lumen package, CCT, voltage and driver. Files from a related family can create a plausible but incorrect calculation.

Test method

Review the file header and accompanying documentation for the tested configuration. Record software version, room geometry, reflectance, calculation grid and light-loss factor so another reviewer can reproduce the model.

Controls boundary

IES and LDT describe light distribution; they do not prove 0-10V, DALI-2, occupancy or emergency-control compatibility. Verify those interfaces separately.

Field boundary

Installed illuminance can shift with aiming, dirt, voltage, furnishings and surface finishes. Mockups or field measurements remain appropriate for critical spaces.

Technical trade-offs worth documenting

Efficacy versus visual comfort: maximizing lm/W can reduce connected load, while glare control, higher color quality and tighter distribution may require a different optical or power choice. Neither objective is universally correct.

Integrated versus serviceable components: integration can reduce size and improve thermal coordination; replaceable drivers or light engines can simplify later maintenance. The project should state which lifecycle priority governs selection.

Request the matching photometric package

Identify the product family, optical distribution, lumen package and calculation workflow.